Keyboard size - brief history
Piano keyboards have not always been the size they are today; between 1784 and 1876, they were smaller than today. Sakai (2008) has documented the variations in keyboard span of various keyboard instruments dating back to 1559. These range from 180 mm for the clavichord to 188 mm (measured across eight keys) for the modern piano keyboard. Much of the best known piano repertoire was written between 1750 and 1850 at a time when the keyboard was smaller (including narrower keys) and repertoire rarely contained intervals larger than an octave.
In the nineteenth century, European composers such as Liszt had strong links with the major manufacturers who organised tours for these composers/virtuosos in order to market their products. They even built and managed concert halls. For example, Anton Rubinstein and Paderewski both toured the US for Steinway in the late 1800s.
Piano playing was seen as highly desirable accomplishment for middle and upper class women (like cooking and sewing). For them, the piano was an integral part of domestic activity, including the courting ritual. There was a clear distinction between amateurs (mostly women) who performed in the home and public performers (mostly men). In the 1800s, separate competitions were held for men and women in the Paris Conservatoire – women were expected to be dignified, feminine and graceful, and were warned by Karl Czerny and others not to play certain types of repertoire. Direct comparisons with men were not welcomed. A Czech company did market a smaller keyboard for ‘ladies’.
The current keyboard size dates back to about 1880, not long after the time when Liszt and others were actively involved with manufacturers. Notable exceptions since then include a smaller keyboard (with narrower keys) specially made by Steinway & Sons for Josef Hofmann early last century. Evidence provided by Steinway Hamburg to Prof Dr Christoph Wagner (founder and director of the Hanover Institute of Music Physiology, 1974-1993) in 1986 states that the Hofmann keyboard was 3.5 cm narrower than normal. This means an octave width of 16 cm: 0.5 cm less than normal. Copies of the original letter to Dr Wagner, and an English translation, are available at the bottom of this page. For further comments about this keyboard in relation to Hofmann's hand span, go to: http://www.paskpiano.org/need-for-narrower-keys.html
Other changes during the 19th and 20th centuries include the use of cast iron frames which led to an increase in string tension resulting in heavier and deeper action, the lengths of keys, the height of blacks over whites, and the vertical dip of the black and white keys. As the piano evolved, the need for standardisation increased as pianists (professional and amateur) started to travel outside their own communities, hence the 'one size fits all' approach that has prevailed over the last century.
‘The size of the piano also affected boys and girls differently. In the eighteenth century the piano had been no bigger than a harpsichord and often smaller. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, though – with pedals appearing at floor level, the keyboard expanding in both directions, and passages in octaves appearing regularly in the newest repertory – the piano suddenly became, for children who learned it, a daunting daily reminder of how far they had to go to measure up in the adult world. Children grow at different rates, and some grow into the piano earlier than others, but many more girls than boys have felt they would never have the instrument – or the part of the repertory created by big-handed men – within their reach. Since the instrument itself has been unyielding in size, the pianist’s seat has been the principal means of helping children, or players of different sizes generally, adapt to it.’ ....Parakilas et al., 1999, Piano Roles, p.151.
Dr Ralph Manchester has summarised the problem of the ‘one size fits all’ approach:
‘Musical instrument design has evolved over time, and that is part of the problem we now face. In most cases, the designers of those instruments were men (rather than women) who lived and worked a few decades to a few centuries ago, mainly in Europe. They were likely to design instruments that they could use and that would be favored by the majority of musicians back then, who were mostly male. Today, musicians comprise a more diverse group with far more women, relatively few persons of European descent, and more persons with various physical disabilities. Nonetheless, we still play instruments that were designed for a fairly homogenous group of performers.’ (Editorial, MPPA, Dec 2006.)
Since 1880, there has been an enormous increase in women undertaking tertiary level training with the aim of pursuing performing careers, as well as a dramatic growth in the number of piano students of Asian ethnicity. Women have hands approximately 15% smaller than men, and Asians have smaller hands than Caucasians. In addition, 20th century piano repertoire often requires larger hand spans than repertoire composed during the 17th to 19th centuries.
The invention and development of the DS standard® piano keyboard with narrower keys
In the early 1990s, Christopher Donison, a pianist, composer and conductor from British Columbia, Canada, met up with Pennsylvanian textile manufacturer and engineer, David Steinbuhler. Together they created a second official keyboard size (the DS standard®), with the long term aim of it becoming universally available.
The first prototype keyboard was built by Steinbuhler & Company in 1994. The company’s first sale in 1996 was to Canadian pianist, Linda Gould, who flew from British Columbia in Canada to try it out. She made an immediate decision to buy a DS5.5® keyboard for her Yamaha grand piano.
Between 1998 and 2005, Steinbuhler invited adult pianists to experiment with a complete range of piano keyboard sizes at their centre in Titusville, Pennsylvania. Participants were able to spend hours or days experimenting and swapping between the different size keyboards. It became clear there was a strong desire for at least two smaller keyboard sizes in addition to the conventional keyboard. To determine the most practical size keyboard for the smaller-handed pianists, a detailed study was conducted using five keyboards measuring between 38 and 42 inches (96.5-106.7 cm) in overall width. About 15 pianists experimented with these keyboards. Although there was a general desire to play the smallest keyboards, it was found that below 40 inches, the space between black keys became too cramped for all but those with the smallest hands with thin fingers.
Hence, in 2000, Southern Methodist University in Texas, the first US university to retrofit a piano with an ESPK (ergonomically scaled piano keyboard)* keyboard, chose the DS5.5® as the best available choice for the smallest hand size. Dr. Carol Leone, Chair of Keyboard Studies at SMU, began to research the benefits of the keyboards. These small keyboard actions can also be installed in pianos of the same make and model with minimal technical adjustment. Dr. Leone travelled with her keyboard action and demonstrated its use at other American universities. Most of these universities consequently acquired their own DS keyboard actions for student use and further research .
Three standards were subsequently defined (octave measurements given represent the total width of seven white keys) as follows:
- DS6.5™ (Conventional keyboard) - 6.5 inch (16.5 cm) octave, 48.29 inches (122.7 cm) total width
- DS6.0® (Universal keyboard, 15/16 width of conventional – 6.0 inch (15.2 cm) octave, 44.57 inches (113.2 cm) total width
- DS5.5® (7/8 keyboard, 5.54 inch (14.1 cm) octave, 41.14 inches (104.5 cm) total width.
- DS5.1™ (Child's keyboard, 5.11 inch (13.0 cm) octave, 37.94 inches ( 96.37 mm) total width.
The size of the Hofmann keyboard mentioned above was between the DS6.5™ and DS6.0® sizes, with a 6.3 inch octave.
In recent years, renowned pianist and conductor, Daniel Baremboim, has been travelling and performing on pianos with narrower keys.
*Notes on terminology
The term ESPK (ergonomically scaled piano keyboard) is now mostly used in the academic community when referring to keyboards smaller than the current 'standard' size, i.e., with 6.5 inch octave. Some literature has used the term 'reduced-size keyboard'. Also note that the DS5.5® is often referred to as the '7/8 keyboard' as the key widths are close to (but not exactly) 7/8 of the 'standard' keyboard. Likewise, the DS6.0® is often referred to as the 15/16 keyboard. ESPK is a generic term that also includes keyboards of other sizes, i.e. that do not conform to the DS standards. The 'DS' abbreviation stands for Donison-Steinbuhler. (Chris Donison and David Steinbuhler have pioneered the introduction of piano keyboards with narrower keys for acoustic pianos, mainly in North America.) The PASK movement (Pianists for Alternatively Sized Keyboards) uses the general term 'alternative sizes' to avoid confusion as 'reduced size' could imply fewer keys.
References and links
Booker, E., & Boyle, R. (2011). Piano keyboards – one size does not fit all! Pianistic health for the next generation. Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Piano Pedagogy Conference: Leading Notes to Effective Teaching: Resolving the past - Exploring the future. Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, 4-8 July 2011. http://www.appca.com.au/2011proceedings.php
Deahl, L. & Wristen, B. (2003). Strategies for small-handed pianists. American Music Teacher, 52 (6), 21-25.
Donison, C. (1998). Small hands? Try this keyboard, you’ll like it. Piano & Keyboard, July-August, 41-43.
Donison, C. (2000). Hand size versus the standard piano keyboard. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 15, 111-114.
Manchester, R. (2006). Musical instrument ergonomics (editorial). Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 21 (4), 157-158.
Parakilas, J. & others. (1999). Piano Roles: Three Hundred Years of Life with the Piano, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Sakai N. (2008) Keyboard span in old musical instruments. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 23, (4),16-171.
Wagner, Ch. (2005) Hand und Instrument. Breitkopf & Härtel, Wiesbaden-Leipzig-Paris, p. 228-240.
|File Size:||1768 kb|